When Azzurri legend and coach Gennaro Gattuso questioned the modern World Cup format in late 2025, I did not hear a technical critique. I heard something familiar, something Africa has dealt with for decades: the suggestion that when the rest of the world rises, Europe somehow suffers

From the looks of it, that argument is not only flawed, it is also revealing.

This is not 1990. And Italy’s problem is not that the world has caught up. It is that Italy has not moved with it.

“Unfair difficulty” illusion

Gattuso’s criticism rests on a premise that collapses under even light scrutiny, that expanding World Cup access has made qualification unfair for European nations.

History tells a different story.

At the 1990 FIFA World Cup, Africa had just two qualification spots.

Two places for a continent rich in talent, diversity, and footballing culture. Yet even within that narrow gateway, Cameroon reached the quarterfinals and reshaped global perceptions.

That achievement did not happen because the system was fair. It happened in spite of it.

For decades, the World Cup leaned heavily toward Europe and South America. It was global in name, but selective in structure.

Entire regions were underrepresented, not because they lacked quality, but because they lacked access.

The expansion to the 2026 FIFA World Cup is not a gift. It is a long-overdue correction.

Europe still holds the largest allocation of places. UEFA remains dominant in numbers. What has changed is that the rest of the world is no longer squeezed into the margins.

And most importantly, qualification remains regional. Africa does not take places from Europe. Asia does not block South America. Each confederation competes within its own framework.

If Italy cannot qualify from Europe, then the problem is not global expansion. It is internal limitation.

A decline years in the making

Italy’s third consecutive absence from the World Cup is often framed as a shock. In reality, it is the logical outcome of a slow, visible decline.

The first World Cup final I remember watching in its entirety was the 2006 edition.

Italy, at its peak, built on the spine of Juventus, AC Milan and Inter Milan. A team rooted in its domestic strength, disciplined, experienced and unshaken on the biggest stage.

And of course, that moment. Zinedine Zidane’s headbutt on Marco Materazzi, a flashpoint that still defines the final as much as the result itself.

Those really were the good days.

But what followed tells a very different story. After that triumph, Italy failed to evolve. Their academy system stagnated, investment lagged, and while their European rivals modernized and surged ahead, Italy gradually lost ground.

France invested in elite academies and built a production line of world-class talent. Germany restructured its entire development model after early 2000s failures. Spain aligned its identity across all levels of football. Even England, long criticized for inefficiency, embraced modern coaching and youth development reforms.

Italy did not respond with the same urgency.

The consequences are now clear. A reduced talent pipeline. Fewer technically adaptable players. A national team that struggles to dictate tempo against opponents who are tactically sharper and physically prepared.

This is not bad luck. It is accumulated neglect.

Accountability without transformation

The latest setback, a playoff defeat to Bosnia and Herzegovina, forced long-awaited consequences.

Gabriele Gravina stepped down as federation president. Gianluigi Buffon left his role within the national setup. Gattuso’s own position has come under scrutiny.

These exits signal acknowledgment. But acknowledgment is not the same as reform.

Italian football now faces a deeper challenge. It must move beyond reactive decisions and confront structural issues. Youth development, coaching philosophy, tactical evolution, and long-term planning all require fundamental reassessment.

Without that, leadership changes become symbolic rather than transformative.

Myth of declining quality

One of the central arguments against expansion is the fear that increasing the number of teams will dilute quality.

From an African perspective, that claim feels detached from reality.

African players are not on the margins of elite football. They are central to it. They influence outcomes in Europe’s top leagues, including Serie A, the very system Italy draws from.

And at international level, the evidence is undeniable.

The current and controversial AFCON champions, Morocco’s run to the semifinals in 2022, was not an isolated moment.

It was the result of organization, discipline, and a generation of players developed across both African and European systems. It reflected a broader shift in global competitiveness.

The gap has not disappeared, but it has narrowed significantly.

Expanding access does not weaken the tournament. It exposes its true competitive depth.

A narrative that holds the game back

When expansion is framed as a problem, it reinforces an outdated hierarchy in football.

Gattuso’s statement gave voice to a persistent Eurocentric bias that still views the World Cup as Europe’s private club with a few invited guests. It implies that growth outside traditional centers is a disruption rather than a progression.

This thinking does more than distort reality. It limits the game.

Football’s global strength lies in its diversity. In its unpredictability. In the emergence of new contenders who challenge established power.

Restricting access does not preserve quality. It preserves comfort.

And comfort, in modern football, is often the first step toward decline.

Italy at a crossroads

Gattuso’s legacy as a player is built on resilience, intensity, and an uncompromising will to compete. Those qualities defined Italy’s success in 2006.

But the modern game demands evolution alongside effort.

Italy’s absence from another World Cup, their third successive edition, is not the result of African inclusion, Asian growth, or a changing global landscape. It is the product of years of hesitation in a sport that rewards adaptation.

From where it stands, the issue is not that the World Cup has changed.

It is that Italy has not changed enough.

The ghost of 1990 is no longer shaping football’s future. But it still lingers in how some choose to interpret the present.

Until Italian football confronts that reality, no reduction in teams, no shift in format, and no appeal to nostalgia will bring it back to where it once stood.

The stakes are sharpening by the week for Fenerbahçe, and Sunday’s derby against Beşiktaş now looms as a pivotal checkpoint in a title race that refuses to settle.

With leaders Galatasaray holding a narrow advantage and games in hand, Fenerbahçe enter Matchday 28 knowing that anything short of victory risks shifting the balance of the season.

Fenerbahçe’s position tells a story of control without full command.

They have lost just once in 27 league matches, a remarkable return built on structure and discipline, yet nine draws have kept the door open for rivals. Level on points with Trabzonspor, they sit in a crowded lane where momentum can flip in a single weekend.

A win would lift them to 63 points and keep pressure firmly on Galatasaray. A stumble could widen the gap and invite a late surge from behind.

Since arriving in September, Domenico Tedesco has reshaped the team into a side that thrives on compactness and intensity.

The pressing is coordinated, the transitions are quick, and the defensive line holds its shape under strain.

At home, they have been particularly difficult to break, combining territorial control with patience in possession.

The midfield has become the engine of that balance. N’Golo Kante shields the defense with relentless coverage, while Matteo Guendouzi adds vertical passing and tempo. Ahead of them, Marco Asensio operates as the creative hinge, drifting into pockets and unlocking tight spaces.

The attacking line has offered variety rather than reliance, with Dorgeles Nene stretching defenses and Talisca providing a direct threat inside the box.

Defensively, the potential return of Milan Skriniar could prove decisive. His presence would stabilize a back line already supported by Jayden Oosterwolde’s athleticism and disciplined positioning.

Goalkeeping rotation has not disrupted rhythm, a sign of depth that has carried Fenerbahçe through a demanding schedule.

Beşiktaş arrive with a different kind of momentum. Under Sergen Yalçın, the team have rediscovered a familiar edge built on tactical awareness and derby resilience.

They are not chasing the title directly, but with 52 points they remain firmly in the European race and capable of shaping the destiny of others.

Recent results point to a side growing in confidence.

Wins over Kasımpaşa and Gençlerbirliği have tightened their structure, even if the narrow defeat to Galatasaray exposed the fine margins they must navigate against elite opponents.

Their away record is solid, and they have shown they can absorb pressure before striking with purpose.

Midfield remains their strongest platform.

Wilfred Ndidi anchors the defensive phase, breaking up play and protecting transitions.

Orkun Kökçü drives forward with composure, linking phases and dictating rhythm, while Vaclav Cerny adds unpredictability in wide areas.

In attack, Oh Hyun-gyu’s movement and Junior Olaitan’s pace offer outlets when space opens.

The tactical battle is likely to hinge on control versus timing. Fenerbahçe will look to dominate territory and press high, forcing errors in dangerous zones.

Beşiktaş are expected to sit deeper, compress space, and exploit the gaps left behind with quick vertical attacks. Discipline in transition will be critical on both sides.

Recent meetings underline the unpredictability.

Fenerbahçe edged a 3-2 comeback win earlier this season, only for Beşiktaş to respond with a 2-1 victory in the Turkish Cup.

The Daily Sabah Newsletter

Keep up to date with what’s happening in Turkey,
it’s region and the world.

SIGN ME UP

You can unsubscribe at any time. By signing up you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Ukraine’s sports authorities on Wednesday urged the International Olympic Committee to review the “neutral” status granted to certain Russian athletes, alleging some have ties to the military or have competed in events that breach Olympic sanctions.

The IOC cleared a limited number of athletes from Russia and Belarus to compete at the 2024 Paris Olympics and the 2026 Milan Winter Games under strict neutrality rules, barring national flags and anthems and requiring thorough eligibility checks.

Those conditions explicitly prohibit athletes with military affiliations or those who supported Moscow’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

In a formal appeal, Ukrainian Sports Minister Matvii Bidny and National Olympic Committee president Vadym Guttsait said they had gathered evidence suggesting some competitors violated IOC guidelines introduced in 2023.

The appeal pointed to what it described as “systematic violations,” particularly in sport climbing and within its governing body, the International Federation of Sport Climbing.

“The Ukrainian side has provided evidence of direct links between a number of athletes and the military structures of the aggressor state,” the statement said.

It cited several athletes officials alleged had links to the military, supported the invasion or had trained in Crimea, which Russia seized and annexed from Ukraine in 2014.

It also said an international competition was held in Moscow last November under the auspices of the International Military Sports Council, in violation of IOC rules.

“This confirms the involvement of Russian military structures in the international sports movement with the aim of legitimizing Russia’s aggressive policy,” the appeal said.

“The Ukrainian side calls on the leadership of the IOC and the IFSC to conduct a comprehensive review of these facts and to suspend the individuals in question from international competitions.”

Some sports bodies have eased restrictions on Russian and Belarusian athletes. The International Paralympic Committee allowed athletes from the two countries to compete at the recent games in Italy with anthems and flags, drawing protests from Ukraine and other countries.

The Daily Sabah Newsletter

Keep up to date with what’s happening in Turkey,
it’s region and the world.

SIGN ME UP

You can unsubscribe at any time. By signing up you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Qualifying is over. The 48-team World Cup in North America is set, and the tournament promises a mix of elite superstars, rising talents, and debut nations bringing their own stories to the world stage.

Over 2.5 years, teams played 2,527 goals, endured heartbreak, and celebrated triumph, culminating Tuesday with six nations claiming the final tickets to soccer’s grandest stage.

Sweden’s journey is nothing short of astonishing.

In its European qualifying group, the Swedes drew two and lost four, finishing last.

Conventional wisdom would have written them off, yet UEFA’s complex system offered a lifeline. Sweden’s top finish in League C of the 2024-25 Nations League, beating Azerbaijan, Slovakia, and Estonia, earned a playoff spot.

In a tense semifinal, Sweden dominated Ukraine 3-1, with Alexander Isak orchestrating the attack and Emil Forsberg dictating tempo in midfield.

The final against Poland was a thriller: trailing 2-1 at halftime, Sweden rallied with a late Forsberg penalty and a stoppage-time strike from Dejan Kulusevski to win 3-2.

Critics may debate whether Sweden “deserves” a World Cup spot, but their grit and tactical adaptability proved enough.

Italy, once a footballing titan, suffered another catastrophic failure.

A penalty shootout loss to Bosnia-Herzegovina sealed their absence from Europe’s 16 slots.

This marks the third consecutive tournament Italy will miss, a blow to a nation that has won four World Cups.

Analysts point to a generation lacking cutting-edge talent, managerial missteps, and questionable squad rotation.

Veteran defenders like Leonardo Bonucci and Marco Verratti failed to provide the defensive backbone expected, while coach Luciano Spalletti struggled to unlock the team’s offensive rhythm.

Italian media branded the outcome “The third apocalypse,” reflecting a national identity crisis in football.

Yet Italian influence persists elsewhere. Vincenzo Montella guided Türkiye to victory over Kosovo, pairing tactical discipline with an attack led by Enes Ünal to clinch World Cup qualification.

Fabio Cannavaro, captain of Italy’s 2006 World Cup-winning team, now leads Uzbekistan, combining disciplined defense and rapid counterattacks to propel a debutant nation onto the world stage.

Carlo Ancelotti joined Brazil last May, bringing his trademark positional fluidity, while Gennaro Gattuso took the Italian job after Claudio Ranieri declined, emphasizing high-press intensity and midfield resilience.

Geopolitics intersected with football. FIFA President Gianni Infantino, a lifelong Azzurri supporter, skipped Italy’s playoff loss to meet Iran’s delegation in Antalya, Türkiye.

Ensuring Iran plays its three scheduled group-stage games in Los Angeles and Seattle despite ongoing conflict will test FIFA’s diplomacy.

Iran’s domestic league remains suspended, but the national team remains determined, highlighting the tournament’s entanglement with global politics.

The expanded 48-team format has introduced new stories. Curaçao, population 156,000, becomes the smallest nation ever to qualify, relying on striker Rangelo Janga’s finishing and goalkeeper Eloy Room’s reflex saves.

Cape Verde, an archipelago off West Africa, used a tight defensive system and efficient set-piece routines to secure their debut.

Congo returns after 52 years, once Zaire, led by captain Chancel Mbemba, whose defensive leadership anchors a young, energetic side.

Uzbekistan and Jordan also join the tournament for the first time, offering a mix of tactical pragmatism and spirited play that could upset traditional powers.

For fans, qualifying’s final days brought logistical hurdles. U.S. authorities and FIFA rushed to process visas for supporters of newly qualified nations, including Iraq, Türkiye, and Congo, under the expedited “FIFA Pass” system championed by President Donald Trump.

Many African nations still face visa bonds up to $15,000, raising concerns for fans wanting to witness history firsthand.

The Daily Sabah Newsletter

Keep up to date with what’s happening in Turkey,
it’s region and the world.

SIGN ME UP

You can unsubscribe at any time. By signing up you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

As the Süper Lig title race tightens, Galatasaray step into one of the season’s most volatile arenas on Saturday, facing a surging Trabzonspor side at Papara Park in a clash that blends pressure, momentum and unfinished business.

The table sets the stakes. Galatasaray lead with 64 points from 26 matches, four clear at the summit. Trabzonspor sit third on 60, having played one game more, level with Fenerbahçe and sensing a late opening.

For Okan Buruk’s side, victory would stretch the gap and place one hand firmly on a fourth consecutive title. For Trabzonspor, it is a chance not only to close the distance but to reframe the championship narrative heading into the final stretch.

Trabzonspor’s transformation

Trabzonspor’s revival has been built on clarity and conviction since Fatih Tekke’s arrival in March 2025. The Black Sea side have evolved into a physically assertive, vertically dangerous team that thrives on momentum.

Their five-game winning streak reflects both efficiency and belief, with narrow wins showing defensive grit and broader victories underlining attacking depth.

At the heart of their surge is Paul Onuachu, the league’s most dominant finisher this season with 21 goals.

His aerial presence reshapes defenses, drawing markers and opening channels for runners around him.

Felipe Augusto complements that threat with mobility and secondary scoring, while Ernest Muçi’s late runs from midfield have added unpredictability.

Oleksandr Zubkov provides the creative spark, often operating between lines and delivering the final pass in tight spaces.

This blend of physicality and technical craft has made Trabzonspor one of the most difficult sides to contain, particularly at home where they combine crowd energy with aggressive pressing phases.

Yet, their defensive line remains a calculated risk.

While more compact than earlier in the season, moments of vulnerability persist, especially when transitions break down. Possible absences and squad rotation could further test their balance against a side as clinical as Galatasaray.

Galatasaray’s machine

Galatasaray arrive as the league’s most complete unit, pairing structure with cutting edge.

Buruk’s system, typically a 4-2-3-1, is built on midfield authority and rapid vertical transitions. They suffocate opponents without the ball and strike with precision once possession is regained.

Their defensive record, just 18 goals conceded, underlines a backline that rarely loses shape.

Davinson Sanchez anchors with authority, while the collective discipline limits space between lines.

This stability allows Galatasaray to commit numbers forward without exposing themselves.

In attack, variety is their greatest weapon. Victor Osimhen brings pace and directness, capable of stretching defenses and punishing high lines.

Mauro Icardi offers contrast, operating as a clinical finisher in tighter spaces.

The wide channels, often driven by Barış Alper Yılmaz and Leroy Sane, create width and crossing lanes, while midfielders like Lucas Torreira ensure transitions remain controlled rather than chaotic.

Even so, there are cracks to monitor. European fixtures have stretched the squad physically, and suspensions or rotation could disrupt rhythm.

Away matches of this intensity demand both mental sharpness and tactical discipline, areas where any lapse could prove costly.

Pressure and memory

Beyond the standings, this fixture carries historical weight. Trabzonspor have not beaten Galatasaray at home in six league meetings, a run that has quietly shifted the psychological balance.

Their last home victory in this matchup, a 4-0 triumph in September 2018, now feels distant.

For the hosts, this is more than a title six-pointer. It is a chance to end a lingering narrative of near misses and reassert dominance in front of their own supporters. For Galatasaray, recent dominance in the fixture adds confidence but also raises expectations.

Maintaining that edge in a hostile environment is part of what defines champions.

Tactical fault lines

The match is likely to be decided in transitions and duels.

Trabzonspor will aim to disrupt Galatasaray’s buildup early, pressing high and forcing turnovers in advanced areas.

Onuachu’s presence will be central, not only as a target but as a reference point for second balls and sustained pressure.

Galatasaray, in contrast, will look to bypass that pressure through controlled buildup and quick switches of play.

If they can draw Trabzonspor forward and exploit the spaces left behind, Osimhen’s runs and Icardi’s positioning could tilt the balance.

Set pieces may also play a decisive role. Both sides possess aerial threats and technical delivery, making dead-ball situations a potential turning point in a tightly contested match.

The Daily Sabah Newsletter

Keep up to date with what’s happening in Turkey,
it’s region and the world.

SIGN ME UP

You can unsubscribe at any time. By signing up you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Luka Doncic delivered a masterclass with 42 points and 12 assists, while LeBron James added 14 points in his record 1,229th career win, lifting the Los Angeles Lakers to a 127-113 victory over the Cleveland Cavaliers on Tuesday.

The Lakers, now 50-26, secured their 13th win in 14 games and had already locked up a playoff berth and the Pacific Division crown earlier in the night after the Phoenix Suns lost.

Sitting third in the Western Conference, Los Angeles holds a two-game cushion over the Denver Nuggets as the postseason picture sharpens.

James surpassed Hall of Fame center Kareem Abdul-Jabbar for the most combined regular-season and playoff wins. The all-time scoring leader added five rebounds and six assists against the Cavaliers, where he spent 11 seasons over two stints.

MVP candidate Doncic returned from an automatic one-game suspension for picking up his 16th technical foul. He became the third-youngest player to reach 15,000 career points at 27 years, 31 days. James holds the mark at 25 years, 79 days.

Jarrett Allen scored 18 points for Cleveland (47-29), which remained one game behind the third-place New York Knicks in the Eastern Conference. James Harden had 17 points, and Donovan Mitchell added 10 points and six assists.

The Cavaliers, whose magic number to make the playoffs is one, have won six of their last eight games and are 16-6 with Harden in the lineup.

DeAndre Ayton had 18 points and nine rebounds, and Austin Reaves scored 19 for Los Angeles, which blew the game open by scoring 45 points in the third quarter to take a 110-83 lead. It was the 100th victory for coach J.J. Redick.

The Lakers carried a 65-53 lead into halftime, fueled by 20 points and seven assists from Doncic and 11 points and six rebounds from Ayton. Allen had 18 points on 9-of-11 shooting, but Mitchell scored only two for the Cavaliers.

Doncic wasted no time getting back in rhythm, taking 10 shots and scoring 14 points while playing the entire first quarter. Cleveland held a 34-32 lead behind nine points from Harden and eight points with three rebounds from Allen.

Los Angeles guard Marcus Smart (right ankle bruise) missed his fourth game in a row, while the Cavaliers were without swingman Sam Merrill (left hamstring soreness).

Cleveland forwards Jaylon Tyson (left great toe bruise) and Dean Wade (right ankle sprain) did not travel with the team on its three-game trip.

The Daily Sabah Newsletter

Keep up to date with what’s happening in Turkey,
it’s region and the world.

SIGN ME UP

You can unsubscribe at any time. By signing up you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.