The U.S. central bank should stand ready to hike interest rates in the near-term if inflation remains above target, the bank’s top official said Monday.

“When inflation is well above its target and the labor market is near full employment and stable, any serious policy rule calls for raising the policy rate to bring down inflation,” a member of the Federal Reserve (Fed) Board of Governors, Christopher Waller, said at an address in Rome.

Waller said Tuesday’s consumer price index (CPI) report will be important.

“If we get another hot reading on core inflation this week, then the (Fed) will need to consider tightening monetary policy in the near term,” he said.

The stance is in line with remarks from newly installed Fed Chair Kevin Warsh, who vowed at his first press conference as head that the central bank would achieve price stability.

Waller noted that the 12-month personal consumption expenditures rate in May stood at 3.4%, well above the Fed’s 2% target.

The Fed “has to be ready to tighten monetary policy to prevent a repeat of the 2021-to-2022 inflation episode,” Waller said.

“Sternly staring at inflation until it melts before our withering gaze is not an option.”

Waller said he was aware of the need to avoid “overtightening” and risking a recession, but that dynamics in the labor market and with inflation point policymakers in a clear direction.

“Unless I see evidence of a significantly weakening labor market, my focus will be on inflation,” Waller said.

The Daily Sabah Newsletter

Keep up to date with what’s happening in Turkey,
it’s region and the world.

SIGN ME UP

You can unsubscribe at any time. By signing up you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

The European Union will move to limit ​young children’s access to social media across the 27-member bloc, European Commission President Ursula von ⁠der Leyen said on Monday, ⁠in what would be the biggest such effort to date to guard against online dangers.

Von ⁠der Leyen’s remarks came as a special EU panel looking into the challenge recommended forbidding access for those under 13 until tech companies can prove their platforms are safe.

Growing awareness of the dangers social media poses for young, developing brains has shown up in a wave of new restrictions globally. Australia, the U.K., Türkiye, Indonesia and others have passed bans on kids under 16 or 15 from using platforms like TikTok, YouTube and Instagram.

Laying out a list of her concerns about the use of social media by kids, von der Leyen, a doctor by training, said that children under 3 should have no exposure to screens at all.

“I believe we need to consider phased and gradual access for different age ranges because childhood won’t wait and once it’s gone, we can never give it back,” von der Leyen told reporters.

“Just as we don’t give our children keys to the car before they have their license, or we do not let them buy alcohol until they are legally allowed. We need to set the age at which they can, the children can, legally access social media,” she said.

“This is not about whether children can access social media. It is about whether and when social media can access our children.”

Von der Leyen noted infinite scrolling as one of the “addictive” traits that tech companies must address.

Beyond toddlers, she did not mention any precise restrictions, but she and the European Commission, the EU’s powerful executive branch, are likely to come up with a proposal for the 27 member countries to weigh in the near future.

Von der Leyen’s policy proposals carry great influence with EU member countries.

A special panel set up to study child safety online delivered its report to the EU chief on Monday. The report said that when it comes to safety, “the burden of proof needs to be on providers, not regulators, parents and children.”

“Until they demonstrate that their services are safe by design, social media and other digital services providers should have restricted access to children under the age of 13 in the EU,” said the report, which is likely to influence von der Leyen’s thinking.

It recommended that “further precautionary age restrictions” should be considered by EU countries for children over 13.

The European Union has been mulling a social media ban since a push by EU states, including Greece and France, for limiting access, with pressure intensifying for a bloc-wide ban.

A legal proposal will come in the second half of the year, von der Leyen added, but she is expected to give an indication of what the restrictions will look like in September.

The report by co-chairs child psychiatrist Jorg Fegert and epidemiologist Maria Melchior offered a glimpse of how the EU’s proposal could look like as they recommended:

No screens at all for babies and toddlers; Supervised use of “age-appropriate social media” and devices children aged between three and 12 by parents or teachers; For those aged 13 to 18, “evolving autonomous use” of social media and other digital platforms that have “key safety features.”

Many social media and video sharing platforms including TikTok and Meta’s Facebook and Instagram are only available to children aged 13 and over.

Platforms “must prove that their services do no harm. In Europe, whoever develops a product is responsible for its safety,” von der Leyen said.

“We are convinced that Europe must introduce protective measures to ensure the safety of children and adolescents in the digital world,” Melchior said, standing next to von der Leyen.

The EU has already ramped up the pressure on social media platforms to change in recent months, telling Facebook and Instagram Friday to dismantle their “addictive” features, after a similar warning to TikTok in February.

Divided EU positions

The report did not recommend a blanket ban on digital platforms including social media, and von der Leyen did not back such a move.

What the panel found was the Australian ban faced difficulties as children found ways around the limits, forcing the EU to reconsider its approach.

Instead, it wants platforms to remove or limit features like autoplay content, infinite scroll, and push notifications.

The European Parliament in October called for a ban on social media for children under the age of 16, a position some EU lawmakers continued to back – although divisions remain over the age.

“I still believe the age should be 15, not 13. 13 is already the minimum age used by most major social media platforms today,” EU lawmaker Christel Schaldemose said in a statement after the panel’s report.

There will likely be difficult negotiations since any EU proposal will only become law after talks between the parliament and member states.

Targeting harmful design

A dilemma for the EU is how to avoid different age limits across 27 countries. For example, Spain wants to ban under-16s accessing social networks, while France proposes prohibiting children aged 15 and under.

And then there are EU nations such as Estonia that oppose a ban.

Von der Leyen said the European Commission, the EU’s executive arm, would “have a very careful look” at the national proposals.

Brussels will “integrate” their work, she said, and then prepare its own proposal to “harmonize the approach and to find a common solution.”

The EU already has a bolstered armory to rein in Big Tech and protect users online, and the commission has said more rules are on the way.

EU consumer protection chief Michael McGrath vowed a new law, expected later this year, will give children stronger protection against addictive design.

The Daily Sabah Newsletter

Keep up to date with what’s happening in Turkey,
it’s region and the world.

SIGN ME UP

You can unsubscribe at any time. By signing up you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Volkswagen may need to eliminate about 50,000 additional jobs to match the competitiveness of its rivals, its CEO told employees in an internal memo, effectively confirming for the first time that the carmaker is considering cuts of up to 100,000 positions.

Oliver Blume is battling to streamline Europe’s biggest carmaker, whose profits have slumped as its faces billions of euros in tariff costs, stiff competition in China and pressure on its German manufacturing network to become more efficient.

After already agreeing 50,000 job cuts across the group, including its Porsche and Audi subsidiaries, the company must work on reducing ⁠costs ⁠further, having calculated a cost disadvantage versus comparable companies of 20%, Blume said in the memo seen by Reuters.

This means a “theoretical deduction” of another 50,000 jobs worldwide, the memo said.

“We are currently assessing across all brands, companies and regions how many adjustments are actually necessary and feasible,” Blume said in the document.

Staff costs are determined not only by the number of employees but also by labor costs, he added. “We must also pull this lever,” he said, indicating that the exact scale of the job cuts has not yet been finalized.

The company had previously declined to ⁠comment on reports it was considering up to 100,000 job losses.

The memo follows angry calls from workers for management to explain its restructuring ​plans, which Blume presented to the company’s supervisory board on Thursday.

Nationwide protests were held by trade union IG Metall on Thursday, while the company’s works council also outlined its fury over the weekend.

Sources ​familiar with the matter said labor representatives on the committee blocked the proposals, which were said to include ⁠job ‌cuts ‌and the possible closure of four factories.

“As ⁠of today, we still cannot ‌confirm competitive use cases for the plants of Emden, Hanover, Zwickau and ​Neckarsulm in the 2030s,” Blume ⁠said in the memo.

He said he ⁠preferred “intelligent solutions” to closures, having previously pointed to the defense ⁠industry or the production ​of Chinese Volkswagen models in Europe as options for underutilized factories.

The Daily Sabah Newsletter

Keep up to date with what’s happening in Turkey,
it’s region and the world.

SIGN ME UP

You can unsubscribe at any time. By signing up you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz fell in the past day to a two-month low, according to shipping data Monday, amid heightened safety worries after renewed strikes between the U.S. and Iran and attacks on ships.

Shipping industry sources said vessels were increasingly switching off their public AIS tracking transponders, making it difficult to ⁠determine the full number of ships crossing the waterway.

Based ⁠on available data, oil and gas tanker traffic fell to its lowest level since May 25, according to analysis from Kpler.

“Should the renewed escalation in the strait lead to another prolonged closure of ​Hormuz, the world will find itself in a much tougher spot,” ship broker Gibson ​said ⁠in a report.

“With global inventories rapidly depleted in recent months, this is a recipe for much tighter supply, higher prices and significant downside risk for tanker markets.”

The Sea Faith oil products tanker was among the few visible vessels sailing toward the entrance to the Strait of Hormuz near the Iranian side of the waterway, with a destination of Sohar, according to LSEG and MarineTraffic ship-tracking data on Monday.

Commercial traffic through the Strait of Hormuz “continued at reduced levels,” the U.S. Navy-led Joint Maritime Information Center (JMIC) said in an advisory on Sunday.

“Traffic patterns continued to reflect operator caution following recent attacks.”

At least three pairs of tankers were involved in ship-to-ship transfers outside of Hormuz off Oman’s coast in the Gulf of Oman, according to the latest satellite imagery from July 11 reviewed by Reuters.

Ship-to-ship (STS) transfers typically involve ⁠the ⁠transfer of oil from one vessel to another. Since the conflict began on Feb. 28, STS transfers have enabled faster deliveries of oil onto waiting ships that do not need to sail through Hormuz.

“Some ships are slipping in and out,” one shipping official said on Monday.

“This has to be viewed as a managed conflict now similar to the Houthis in the Red Sea,” the source said, referring to the Yemeni militia, which paralyzed traffic through the Bab al Mandeb waterway for nearly two years before calling a cease-fire in 2026.

Trump, Iran differ over strait status

U.S. forces completed another wave of strikes against Iran on Sunday, hitting dozens of targets at multiple ⁠locations with precision munitions, the Central Command said.

U.S. President Donald Trump said on Sunday that the Strait of Hormuz is open to commercial traffic, although Iran declared earlier that it closed the strait after a vessel traveled on an unapproved route and was struck.

Iran’s Revolutionary ​Guards said on Monday that their navy stopped two ships in the Strait of Hormuz last night by shutting down ​their systems. They did not name the ships involved.

A container ship sustained damage from an unknown projectile which caused a fire in the engine room on Sunday, JMIC said.

Traffic slowdown

Six vessels transited the ⁠strait on Sunday, ‌ship-tracking data from ‌Kpler showed, the lowest number in five weeks.

Tankers that exited the strait ⁠included the Very Large Crude Carrier Humanity, laden with 2 million barrels ‌of Iranian oil, and another tanker, Capetan Andreas, carrying about 500,000 barrels of Kuwaiti oil products, the data showed, while three empty tankers entered the ​Gulf to load oil.

Most of the ⁠tankers switched off their transponders when crossing the strait.

There were no liquefied natural ⁠gas tankers that entered the strait over the weekend that were visible on ship-tracking data.

One tanker controlled by the ⁠Abu Dhabi National Oil ​Co exited the strait between July 10 and July 12, Kpler data showed. The vessel was heading for Dahej port in India.

The Daily Sabah Newsletter

Keep up to date with what’s happening in Turkey,
it’s region and the world.

SIGN ME UP

You can unsubscribe at any time. By signing up you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

State energy company BOTAŞ on Monday started construction of a fourth storage tank at its terminal in northwestern Türkiye, a move that will increase the facility’s LNG storage capacity by nearly 60%.

The new 160,000-cubic-meter storage tank will raise the Marmaraereğlisi LNG Terminal’s total storage capacity to 415,000 cubic meters from the current 255,000 cubic meters, Energy and Natural Resources Minister Alparslan Bayraktar said.

The investment is expected to improve Türkiye’s flexibility in managing natural gas supplies by expanding its ability to store LNG delivered by ships, regasify it when needed and transport it via road tankers while maintaining it in liquid form.

Located in Tekirdağ province, the Marmaraereğlisi LNG Terminal plays a strategic role during periods of high natural gas demand, particularly in winter months, with a daily regasification capacity of 37 million cubic meters.

The terminal can accommodate conventional LNG carriers as well as large-capacity Q-Flex and Q-Max vessels, which are among the world’s largest LNG carriers.

Around 65 LNG vessels dock at the facility annually, with the terminal meeting approximately 15% of Türkiye’s annual natural gas demand.

In addition to LNG storage and regasification operations, the facility carries out road tanker loading, fuel supply and reload operations.

Strengthening resilience against energy shocks

Bayraktar said the terminal’s ability to source gas from multiple markets, combined with its storage capacity and regasification infrastructure, makes it a key component of Türkiye’s energy security strategy.

The minister noted that fluctuations in global energy markets have demonstrated the importance of having strong infrastructure.

Bayraktar said the new investment will “strengthen our natural gas infrastructure” and will “increase our resilience against crises.”

Türkiye currently has five LNG entry points, including two LNG terminals and three floating storage and regasification units (FSRUs).

Alongside the Marmaraereğlisi LNG Terminal, BOTAŞ operates the Dörtyol and Saros FSRU facilities.

As part of Türkiye’s National Energy and Mining Policy, LNG regasification capacity has increased nearly fivefold since 2016, rising from 34 million cubic meters per day to around 161 million cubic meters per day.

The government aims to raise total LNG regasification capacity to 200 million cubic meters per day with the addition of two new FSRU facilities.

The Daily Sabah Newsletter

Keep up to date with what’s happening in Turkey,
it’s region and the world.

SIGN ME UP

You can unsubscribe at any time. By signing up you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Türkiye ​has informed Canada that it will participate in the ⁠Defense Security and ⁠Resilience Bank (DSRB) as a founding member, a report said on Monday

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said at a NATO summit in Ankara last week that nine countries, including Türkiye, had committed to the bank, in what was seen as ⁠a ⁠boost for the multilateral drive to help rearm allied nations.

Defense ​Ministry sources ⁠said over the weekend that Türkiye was still evaluating possible participation.

“Türkiye has informed Canada that it will participate in the bank,” a Turkish official told ​Reuters on Monday.

According to Carney’s statement last week, Albania, Belgium, Greece, Latvia, Luxembourg, Romania, Türkiye and Ukraine had all pledged their support to the bank, which will be based in ​Canada.

The roster contained no heavyweight G-7 ​nations other than Canada, potentially limiting the bank’s financial firepower, although ⁠Canada’s foreign minister, Anita Anand, told ⁠Reuters it would remain ‌open to new members.

The bank’s purpose ​is to bolster ⁠the defense of like-minded allied ⁠nations by raising up to 100 billion pounds ($134 ⁠billion) ​in cheap financing.

Carney is promoting the DSRB as part of his call this year for an ⁠alliance of “middle powers” to combat what he sees as the fracturing of the traditional U.S.-led world order.

A group of former NATO security ‌advisers, senior ex-military personnel and bankers proposed the bank in 2024.

NATO nations and their allies are grappling with rising defense demands linked to the war in Ukraine, growing tensions with Russia and concerns about ​China’s military expansion.

NATO leaders agreed in June 2025 to ⁠spend 5% of GDP on defense and security-related investments by 2035.

Top banks, including JPMorgan, Deutsche Bank, Commerzbank and ING, have ⁠joined the project alongside Canada’s RBC, ​BMO, CIBC, National Bank of Canada, Scotiabank and TD Bank.

The Daily Sabah Newsletter

Keep up to date with what’s happening in Turkey,
it’s region and the world.

SIGN ME UP

You can unsubscribe at any time. By signing up you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.